🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his wish to see critics investigated, applying pressure on the DOJ to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone further, it's killing our standing and trustworthiness," the leader wrote last month in a Truth Social post.

"They impeached me, and indicted me (five times!)" he declared, mentioning the four criminal cases he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's civil case.

Each have since been indicted, in cases that numerous experts have said seem to be driven by politics and difficult to win in legal proceedings.

But the most recent charges against a presidential opponent, ex national security adviser John Bolton, stand apart, legal specialists and former prosecutors assert.

"I would say, comparing Bolton's charges to James' is like comparing two different things," said Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of the Legal Situation

Bolton has been formally charged on national allegations related to the alleged mishandling of sensitive materials. After leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a vocal presidential opponent, even to describe him "remarkably ignorant" and unfit for the presidency in his book.

Experts contend that while there may be political motivations to target Bolton, the procedures used to secure an indictment and the evidence gathered against him suggest a potentially stronger case than the Justice Department brought against James.

"These actions that's being alleged is both more severe and appears to have occurred over a considerable duration," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

During his time as Trump's security advisor, and after his 2019 White House departure, authorities claimed that Bolton put the nation at danger by wrongfully keeping and transmitting classified information to family members using unprotected methods, including AOL. Several of the documents were marked highly classified.

The indictment states that at one point a hacker accessed to Bolton's system where files were stored and sent an apparent threat to cause "the biggest scandal since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a court appearance on Friday to eighteen separate counts of improperly handling sensitive materials.

Political Motivation or a Strong Legal Argument?

The schedule of his charge - coming on the heels of allegations against Comey - has revived concerns about political pressure on the justice system.

Trump previously suggested Bolton should be in prison, and described him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his role, wrote a book about his time in the Trump government that was highly critical of the president.

"There's no question that the schedule of this charge, when paired with additional cases, has raised doubts about the validity of these allegations, and why these counts are being brought now," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "should the Justice Department is capable to demonstrate the facts stated and demonstrate the information is properly classified, his behavior may certainly have broken the law".

Prosecuting such a senior official for mishandling classified documents is "uncommon" but not unprecedented, noted Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that concern classified information present difficulties to prosecute, but they can and are brought against equally junior and senior officials, from time to time," she explained.

Parallels to Examinations into Trump and Biden

Trump likewise encountered charges of improperly keeping sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and hindering their return, but that case was ultimately dismissed by a court official and negated by his return as president.

A independent investigator additionally found that ex-President Joe Biden improperly stored classified documents from his period as second-in-command, but failed to criminally charge him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Trump's classified documents issues, said Mr Lesko, who also held a senior security role at the Justice Department.

Strict procedures regulate the handling of classified documents. To win a conviction, the prosecution must demonstrate that Bolton knew the information he was transmitting was restricted, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone without authorization to obtain it.

"Because of the sensitive nature of the material at issue in this matter, we don't have a lot of details about why the government believes things like the personal notes and the additional information he communicated by email, and the reason there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Traditional Prosecution

The procedure by which the DOJ brought this legal action will be closely examined, following Trump openly expressed his desire to see his critics prosecuted and some of those charges materialized.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's case, prosecutors appear to have adhered to protocol.

"The Bolton case and eventually the indictment appeared to have observed the standard procedure including the rules and standards within the Department of Justice," he stated.

Unlike Comey's brief, concise indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" document that "clearly outlines the particulars concerning the circumstances and circumstances in this instance," Mr Lesko said.

"It appears fairly aligned with a series of precedents... where public servants mishandled and transmitted sensitive information."