It is devastating’: the way thirty captive beluga whales are being used as tools in row over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming little “ham sandwich”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.
A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a tussle between a defunct facility, public officials and animal rights activists.
But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their destiny often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been carefully observed by the people who see them each day.
After the Canadian government blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to put them down unless the federal government covers the expense of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious situation.
Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures
Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, problem solving and group interactions indicate they are remarkably smart animals – something a former trainer learned first-hand.
She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a role that entailed building relationships of the marine predators.
“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”
Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the nuances and quirks in their dispositions. She formed a special affection for two female belugas with opposing temperaments.
“One whale selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each transformed the way I view relationships.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Her interaction with the whales evolved against a context of rising activist criticism to their confinement.
During her time at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the facility links to natural mortality, but which advocates say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The park did not open to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”
The facility did not reply to a questionnaire, but earlier stated: “The whales … obtain far higher quality veterinary services and constant care than any person in the Britain, or elsewhere.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
Burgess was dismissed from the park in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park suspected details of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was released not long after.
The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left her and other caretakers in distress. She says the facility’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and heavy equipment.
“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess backs requests for the whales to be transferred immediately from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.
In recent months, Canada’s government official turned down a request to export the whales to an overseas location.
“Allowing the application would have meant a perpetual existence in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that whales should be in the sea, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would prolong the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But the former trainer said the official’s statements indicate a wider incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As decision makers attempt to find a answer, ideas have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a important part of nourishment for Inuit communities.
A planned sanctuary in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The future facility, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain positive that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for eight of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ well-being.
Different voices say the idea of a refuge represents a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a workable plan in the short term.
Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the facility will replicate the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|